Subject	Re: But low flow (rpm) is shown on that chart
Posted by	Kenny on February 02, 2006 at 8:04 AM
	This message has been viewed 24 times.
In Reply To	But low flow (rpm) is shown on that chart posted by maglito on February 01, 2006 at 08:27 PM
Message	Thus the curve or at least a further slant (not simply a shift). Call it semantics if you want to, but these are important differences. You said curve then, now you say slant. The lines will not curve. They will shift to the right, and possibly increase slant angle - but they will not curve. This is because the engine rpm scale is linear, as is the engines ability to consume air, using the simple formula that was initally use to plot out the equation. A more accurate formula would yield fundamentally different results. Good luck figuring out what it is though. I notice you didn't comment on THIS post in the thread. Very perceptive. You get a cookie. Recursively Yours, Kenny... PETZ Member #5 SteamyZ. Never had did me wrong. - SL103 07/06/04 11:58:15
Follow Ups	Volumetric Efficiency question ... - The Devils Z 13:24:03 02/01/06 Well, what's your question? - Kenny 13:38:07 02/01/06 to be honest -- "I don't even know what I am saying".. - The Devils Z 13:50:53 02/01/06 FWIW, that seems to be correct to me. (n/m) - Kenny 14:12:07 02/01/06 Thank you .. (n/m) - The Devils Z 14:34:44 02/01/06 input, again LONG>> - maglito 16:32:36 02/01/06 I think his question (and mine as well) - maglito 15:51:12 02/01/06 I don't see why the lines would curve. - Kenny 17:01:56 02/01/06 Maybe the lines wouldn't curve, not sure - it was a guess - maglito 18:16:14 02/01/06 I didn't say they were equal, I said effectively equivalent. - Kenny 18:33:38 02/01/06 But low flow (rpm) is shown on that chart - maglito 20:27:11 02/01/06 Re: But low flow (rpm) is shown on that chart - Kenny 08:04:53 02/02/06 Thanks Kenny (n/m) - maglito 12:28:13 02/02/06 I've wanted to get a better understanding of VE. LONG>>> - maglito 15:39:10 02/01/06 I thought is would be simplier --not necessarily being - The Devils Z 16:04:43 02/01/06 Re: I thought is would be simplier --not necessarily being - Kenny 16:58:40 02/01/06 thank u ...again (n/m) - The Devils Z 17:25:13 02/01/06 Re: Re: I thought is would be simplier --not necessarily bei - Pacmanpth 19:10:01 02/01/06 Re: I've wanted to get a better understanding of VE. LONG>>> - Kenny 16:44:06 02/01/06 better better auto nesting of replies would be nice - maglito 18:12:26 02/01/06 Re: better better auto nesting of replies would be nice - Kenny 19:07:01 02/01/06 I read your post - maglito 23:40:07 02/01/06 Re: I read your post - Kenny 07:58:03 02/02/06 Thanks - maglito 12:47:47 02/02/06 Dee, I'll have to sit down and show you how all this comes - Ash's Z 16:22:25 02/01/06 Why is asking a few questions embarassing? (n/m) - Kenny 16:37:01 02/01/06 Probably so ...that is why I asked the question to increase - The Devils Z 17:27:49 02/01/06 Hahahah! Well, you know I'd be happy to give you the time. (n/m) - Ash's Z 23:06:30 02/01/06 It'll be interesting to compare your data with mine, - Scotts94z32 17:40:55 02/01/06 Re: It'll be interesting to compare your data with mine, - Rule12b 18:05:22 02/01/06 just a reference link of compressor maps. - WAGGZ 21:49:10 02/01/06 The biggest mistake in your theory... - degradated 12:43:28 02/02/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.